I overcame the trouble just revising the twistav_pwscf.
Thank you.
Search found 10 matches
- Tue Dec 20, 2016 8:01 am
- Forum: The CASINO program
- Topic: Simple question about twistav_pwscf script
- Replies: 1
- Views: 23162
- Sat Dec 10, 2016 6:36 am
- Forum: The CASINO program
- Topic: Simple question about twistav_pwscf script
- Replies: 1
- Views: 23162
Simple question about twistav_pwscf script
Dear, Could I designate the path of espresso's and casino's home directory when I use twistav_pwscf? CASINO manual says that I can add the arguments for run_pwscf and run_qmc like this: twistav_pwscf [--help --nproc_dft=I --splitqmc[=N] --startqmc=M --dft_only/--qmc_only --ntwist=L [<runqmc/runpwscf...
- Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:47 pm
- Forum: The CASINO program
- Topic: Peak at block length v.s. on-the-fly method
- Replies: 5
- Views: 19279
Re: Peak at block length v.s. on-the-fly method
Dear Katharina,
Thank you for your reply.
The calculation may be huge certainly.
I will reexamine the calculation setting considering what you suggested.
Ichibha
Thank you for your reply.
The calculation may be huge certainly.
I will reexamine the calculation setting considering what you suggested.
Ichibha
- Sun Aug 28, 2016 5:07 am
- Forum: The CASINO program
- Topic: Peak at block length v.s. on-the-fly method
- Replies: 5
- Views: 19279
Re: Peak at block length v.s. on-the-fly method
Hi Katharina, Thank you for your response. The target system is iron(II) phthalocyanine, and the calculation is DMC with all-electron CASSCF trial wave function. Its timestep is quite small, 0.0001, which is determined following "R.M. Lee et al. , Phys. Rev. E 83 , 066706 (2011)." Ichibha
- Sat Aug 27, 2016 1:15 pm
- Forum: The CASINO program
- Topic: Peak at block length v.s. on-the-fly method
- Replies: 5
- Views: 19279
Peak at block length v.s. on-the-fly method
Dear, I have a question about reblocking analysis. Data below seems to be converged at 131072 block length (peak of Std.Err.), but on-the-fly says, on the other hand, the optimal block length is 4096. Which one should I trust? Ichibha. -------------------------------- Block len Std error Err in erro...
- Sun Jul 19, 2015 7:28 am
- Forum: The CASINO program
- Topic: VMC energy doesn't equal SCF one.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 21820
Re: VMC energy doesn't equal SCF one.
Dear all,
Sorry for my late response.
By substituting gpcc for normal cusp_correction, The calculation runs correctly.
Thank you very much, Vladimir and Neil.
Ichibha
Sorry for my late response.
By substituting gpcc for normal cusp_correction, The calculation runs correctly.
Thank you very much, Vladimir and Neil.
Ichibha
- Sun Jul 12, 2015 8:35 am
- Forum: The CASINO program
- Topic: Probable population explosion occurs
- Replies: 3
- Views: 13227
Re: Probable population explosion occurs
Dear Katharina,
Thank you very much for you supply.
I saw the picture of dmc.hist, and config increased suddenly.
My supervisor also said that something may have been wrong with cusp.
So I will brush up the Jastrow function and retry.
Ichibha
Thank you very much for you supply.
I saw the picture of dmc.hist, and config increased suddenly.
My supervisor also said that something may have been wrong with cusp.
So I will brush up the Jastrow function and retry.
Ichibha
- Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:21 am
- Forum: The CASINO program
- Topic: VMC energy doesn't equal SCF one.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 21820
VMC energy doesn't equal SCF one.
Dear all, I performed VMC calculations with the CI trial wave function ,which is made without all pseudo potential and of which basis set is gaussian basis basis set. But I was not able to get correct vmc energy: First, I performed the calculation with 'cusp correction', and vmc energy was about 100...
- Fri Jul 10, 2015 2:42 am
- Forum: The CASINO program
- Topic: Probable population explosion occurs
- Replies: 3
- Views: 13227
Probable population explosion occurs
Dear all,
I'm trying to make a success of a DMC calculation.
but I encounter 'probable population explosion'.
The calculation is all electron one, and its trial wave
function is CI and its basis set is gaussian basis set.
Could you tell me how to prevent this probrem?
Ichibha
I'm trying to make a success of a DMC calculation.
but I encounter 'probable population explosion'.
The calculation is all electron one, and its trial wave
function is CI and its basis set is gaussian basis set.
Could you tell me how to prevent this probrem?
Ichibha
- Mon May 25, 2015 9:53 am
- Forum: The CASINO program
- Topic: CASSCF computation
- Replies: 8
- Views: 21914
Re: CASSCF computation
Follwing casino manual,
I think you should add FormCheck=(MO,Basis) into input file.
I think you should add FormCheck=(MO,Basis) into input file.